A new set of deep-space images has reignited one of the strangest scientific arguments of 2025. The photos show sideways jet-like lines shooting out from the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS. Their geometry is so unusual that Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb says they may not be natural at all.Some astronomers insist the object is simply a weird comet. Others believe Loeb is once again over-interpreting anomalies. But Loeb says the new data cannot be ignored: the lines look like the paths of smaller ejected objects traveling alongside 3I/ATLAS.
Here’s what the debate is really about.
What exactly has been discovered?A new stacked image taken on 20 November shows two thin, ruler-straight lines extending roughly one million kilometers on either side of 3I/ATLAS. Unlike a normal comet tail, these lines run perpendicular to the Sun–object axis, forming anThe problem: comets do not normally produce such sideways features. Their jets tend to point away from the Sun because solar radiation pushes dust and gas in predictable directions.
Close-up tracked image of 3I/ATLAS taken with a 0.30-mf/4 reflector, showing the main coma, tail, and the orientation of sunlight during the observation. The stacked sequence highlights the jet structure emerging from the object. (Credit: M. Jäger, G. Rhemann, E. Prosperi)
Loeb’s argument is simple:
If these lines are real and not satellite streaks, they look like the trails of smaller objects that peeled away from 3I/ATLAS near perihelion.Why the lines don’t behave like natural jets
Loeb highlights two anomalies:
1. Perfect straightness
3I/ATLAS rotates roughly every 16 hours. Any natural jet should have produced visible wiggles or broken patterns from that rotation. Instead, the lines are perfectly narrow and straight over hundreds of thousands of kilometres.
2. Wrong orientation
Jets caused by sunlight and dust pressure emerge along the Sun-facing side. These lines sit at right angles to that axis, which is extremely difficult to explain with standard comet physics.To match the observed distance, the smaller objects would need speeds of roughly 500 meters per second, which Loeb notes is compatible with small fragments separating — whether naturally or artificially.So… could this be alien technology?
Long-exposure view of 3I/ATLAS against a dense star field, capturing its extended tail and diffuse structures stretching across the frame. This wide-angle composition provides context for the evolving morphology of the interstellar visitor. (Credit: M. Jäger, G. Rhemann, E. Prosperi)
Loeb does not claim the features are artificial. He offers a fork:
- Natural explanation: ice chunks or fragments breaking off from a fracturing cometary body.
- Technological explanation: small probes released from an interstellar craft or “mothership”.
- He argues that both remain on the table until more data arrives. The coming weeks of monitoring, he says, will determine whether the trails behave like inert debris or controlled small craft.
This isn’t the first time Loeb has taken such a stance. His work on ‘Oumuamua and the Galileo Project has made him the most prominent figure in the “open-minded but data-driven” camp. At Harvard he remains a divisive but influential voice pushing astronomy to treat anomalies seriously.
Why this matters
3I/ATLAS is only the third confirmed interstellar object ever observed. Every data point offers rare insight into materials, structures and behaviors shaped outside the Solar System.The new features also land in the middle of a polarized scientific environment. Loeb’s critics say he raises alien-technology hypotheses too freely. His supporters argue that institutional astronomy is too quick to dismiss the unexplained.But the images are public, the measurements are clear, and the sideways lines are not easy to hand-wave away. Whether natural fragments or technological artefacts, the phenomenon demands explanation.And if the features turn out to be satellite streaks, as some skeptics hope, the discussion will still have revealed how science reacts to anomalies in real time — with caution, disagreement and curiosity rubbing uncomfortably against one another.What happens next?Astronomers will continue tracking both the main object and the faint lines to see if the suspected mini-objects:
- drift predictably according to gravity
- disperse like passive dust
- or move with a consistent acceleration suggesting propulsion
If the lines remain stable and the objects persist, Loeb’s case becomes stronger. If not, the comet hypothesis wins.Either way, this is shaping up to be one of the defining astronomical debates of the year.
